I see something like this quoted frequently in Chevron discussions: “Leaves scientific and public health matters to the personal views of judges.” Is this accu

I see something like this quoted frequently in Chevron discussions: “Leaves scientific and public health matters to the personal views of judges.” Is this accurate? Or would the experts - currently sitting in regulatory bodies, or lobbying somewhere - transition to the courts, similar to how they are used in criminal cases? Are the “batshit-but-here-for-life” edge case judges really going to be making decisions based on their personal non expert views? Sounds like negligence.