3 ms·
That's because opposition to CSAM filtering is expressed as a defense mechanism, in this case splitting[1] also known as black or white thinking. Either the fil
by kelseyfrog 2y ago
That's because opposition to CSAM filtering is expressed as a defense mechanism, in this case splitting[1] also known as black or white thinking. Either the filter is 100% accurate or we can't have it at all. Splitting ranks low(level 2)[2] on the hierarchy of defense mechanisms.
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_(psychology) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splitting_(psychology)
2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555762/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8555762/
- snapcaster 2y agoThat's not the opposition to it though? I think you're attacking a strawman (also just pointing to some fields classification of something isn't actually an argument) It's the invasion of privacy not accuracy rates of the model
- kelseyfrog 2y agoTo be sure there are different ways people argue against CSAM filtering. One is that it has false positive and negatives, others, like you mentioned involve privacy. Some people even feel like it's an invasion of privacy and then justify their argument by saying that it has false positives and negatives.