3 ms·

Also on todays news - in the github copilot (and OpenAI) case about stolen content the judge dismissed majority of it: https://www.theregister.com/AMP/2024/07/

• deleted 2y ago
  [deleted]
• xivzgrev 2y ago
  These plaintiffs need a new lawyer, one experienced with going up against big corporations you can’t be amateur hour in these cases. things like not requesting emails in the right way, or offering arguments the judge easily swats away. The thrust of their case is important but if they’re fumbling the ball they’re going to get destroyed on procedure.
• falcolas 2y ago
  Always worth remembering as we watch these cases go through the system that "legal" and "moral" (or even "benefits society") are not the same thing. They are usually intended to be the same thing, but the rule of law will never fully capture the intent, especially as time passes.
• tim333 2y ago
  It would be tricky do stop AI looking at content and making something inspired by it as humans have been doing that as a basic occupation for centuries. You'd have to differentiate between a human looking at stuff and then producing art and a machine doing it but what if a machine and human work together? I'm not sure how you'd differentiate legally.