4 ms·
> A loud minority requesting a feature First, thanks for acknowledging that it's not "just me". That kind of nonsensical hyperbole doesn't help the discussion.
by dataflow 2y ago
> A loud minority requesting a feature
First, thanks for acknowledging that it's not "just me". That kind of nonsensical hyperbole doesn't help the discussion.
Second: You have no idea if it's a minority of the market that actually wants this. The majority of users obviously use Adobe, that should tell you more than how many people are voicing their opinions in a forum. Not every user goes out of their way to re-request a feature that's already been requested years ago.
> doesn't mean it's a deal-breaker for other users.
Nobody said it's a deal breaker for "other users".
> Clearly the company behind the product agrees, otherwise they would've implemented it.
Because there's no other possible reason we could fathom as to why they wouldn't have implemented this already, right?
- Etheryte 2y agoThis is such a silly stance to take. Just because something is important or painful for you doesn't make it universal, no matter which way you try to frame it. Just like you won't see the users who don't rerequest a feature, you won't see all the users who don't even remotely care about it.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- dataflow 2y ago> Just because something is important or painful for you doesn't make it universal, Again: nobody said it was "universal", but again: it's not about me, either. It's ridiculous that you're still insisting it's just me when you literally see other people complaining about it. You clearly aren't interested in having a reasonable conversation so there's no point in continuing to engage.