That’s not really how the law works though. You need to actually prove with evidence actual wrongdoing on their part as a person. Or at a minimum prove that th

That’s not really how the law works though. You need to actually prove with evidence actual wrongdoing on their part as a person. Or at a minimum prove that they failed in their fiduciary duties - a frustratingly murky concept. Innocent until proven guilty, burden of proof etc all still applies. Some general sense of well you were at the helm and everyone is angry thus you go to jail isn’t going to stick legally. That’s not to say I’m against it, if they can manage to find suitable evidence they absolutely should. Just saying the article is big on emotion (rightly so) and thin on legal basis.