3 ms·

macOS sonoma supports L4S for this purpose: https://www.theverge.com/23655762/l4s-internet-apple-comcast-latency-speed-bandwidth https://www.theverge.com/23655

• fmbb 2y ago
  What do you mean “this purpose”? The text linked in OP says > Congestion signalling methods cannot work around this problem either, so our analysis is also valid for Explicit Congestion Notification methods such as Low Latency Low Loss Scalable Throughput (L4S).
  • ajb 2y ago
    L4S (or at least, the dualq implementation) uses a shallow buffer. You can't get 1000ms of latency if your buffer is only 15ms. Although the title claims there's no way round latency spikes, their paper [1] explores the case where latency spikes are traded off against allowing packet loss, which is what you're going to get if you fill a shallow buffer. For real-time traffic, packet dropping is usually preferable. [1] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.00488 https://arxiv.org/pdf/2111.00488
• sulandor 2y ago
  though it supports fair-queuing since 2018