I'm not opposed to scrutiny, I'm opposed to uninformed speculation and sensationalizing of totally normal safety operations. If we were talking about patterns

I'm not opposed to scrutiny, I'm opposed to uninformed speculation and sensationalizing of totally normal safety operations. If we were talking about patterns and stats that would be one thing, but this kind of pile-on after every Boeing anecdote isn't data-driven and isn't meaningful. It's just confirmation bias, and I prefer to see better on HN.