3 ms·
>It’s hard to say that Chappell Roan is particularly derivative of anything I've never heard of her, but the first search result I got is this: https://www.you
by whyoh 2y ago
>It’s hard to say that Chappell Roan is particularly derivative of anything
I've never heard of her, but the first search result I got is this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RKqOmSkGgM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1RKqOmSkGgM
It seems very derivative to me.
And FWIW I think there's plenty of high quality and original/creative music out there nowadays. But the 'top 40' category does seem quite stale and boring (judging by the music I hear in shopping malls/bars...).
- bobthepanda 2y agoPersonally I think these are probably more representative of her work: * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bw5K138hoU https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0bw5K138hoU * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9Wxl9Q9lUQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y9Wxl9Q9lUQ What would you say this is derivative of, and how is this more derivative than other music? What is an example of not-derivative music by this criteria? Nearly all music depends on some kind of prior art. You can be reductive about any genre of music; for a couple hundred years choral and classical European music was nearly all about devotion to God.