3 ms·
> "You'd much rather read a Java program because you are already biased towards it." No. I'd rather read "int foo; bar.printLn()" than "%foo => &bar :print" L
by mibbitier 14y ago
> "You'd much rather read a Java program because you are already biased towards it."
No. I'd rather read "int foo; bar.printLn()" than "%foo => &bar :print"
Less special characters. More words.
Each to their own though.
- koide 14y agoSo you'd also rather read "An unordered tuple Z going from a1 to an is a defined as for every x in Z then x is a1 or x is a2 ... or x is an" than "An unordered tuple Z (a1,...,an) is defined as [x : x = a1 v x = a2 v ... x = an]"? I take that as not being (or not wanting to be) familiar with the language you are reading. If you'll read Ruby, at least browse a manual to know what {} and # mean.
- pi18n 14y agoThe psuedo-Ruby code posted there is characteristic of someone who is having a knee-jerk reaction against something they don't understand. The person we are arguing against is obviously a Java zealot that will never consider using another language, so as long as he's going to accept that different people like different languages I think that's good enough for today.
- pi18n 14y ago> Each to their own though. I'll agree with that wholeheartedly.