3 ms·
What I'm hearing from this comment and all sentiment that agrees with it: My mother should never experience the benefits a computer can bring to her life becau
by kgosser 14y ago
What I'm hearing from this comment and all sentiment that agrees with it:
My mother should never experience the benefits a computer can bring to her life because the only device she could understand how to use would be something like an iPad—and since the iPad is made by a company that isn't 100% open, it shouldn't exist at all. Everyone should use Ubuntu, and if you can't use it, it's because you're too stupid and thus don't deserve to have a computing device in your life. Open source principals are more important than anything else, and they must be applied in a binary fashion, scaled across all approaches to computing in the world.
----
A pet peeve of mine is "hackers" ignoring design, and showing zero empathy towards humans [1]. Perhaps we need more designers in the world and not more hackers who stick tight to principals, often completely blinded by these binary maxims they drum up to the real end goal: enabling our species to advance.
[1] http://krisgosser.com/journal/2011/08/empathy-is-most-important/ http://krisgosser.com/journal/2011/08/empathy-is-most-import...
- stickfigure 14y agoThis is a false dichotomy. Just because your mother uses iOS devices (and probably a lot of other closed devices) doesn't mean you should. You, presumably, are a hacker. While hackers represent a small part of the population, they represent a very important part of the market - the part that builds the wider ecosystem. We have a disproportionate effect on the evolution of technology. Use devices that advance an agenda that should be important to you - the ability to make devices do what you want, not what its manufacturer wants them to do. Besides, you make the non-Apple world sound more bleak than it is. While Android is not quite as polished as iOS, it's perfectly usable by nontechies.