> Stylometric analysis shows this to be the same person with a high degree of probability. Sounds like this is a new technique unproven to the high standards r

> Stylometric analysis shows this to be the same person with a high degree of probability. Sounds like this is a new technique unproven to the high standards really needed for legal evidence. The "anything plausible sounding goes" approach is already a problem for other widely used types of "evidence". Those need to be stamped out too, not have new unproven crap added, making the problem worse.