3 ms·
That simulator hits home. The discouragement and anguish was real. I finished my Ph.D. in 6 years rather than the usual 4 1/2 because ideas just didn't work ou
by wenc 2y ago
That simulator hits home. The discouragement and anguish was real.
I finished my Ph.D. in 6 years rather than the usual 4 1/2 because ideas just didn't work out. My topic was much harder than those of my peers.
That said, I felt the 2 extra years I spent made me a much more solid researcher in my narrow field, because I spent more time learning and relearning the foundations of my craft.
I relate to what Winston Churchill said about being a dunce at school (who later become a incomparable wartime orator distinguished by his use of simple English):
"By being so long in the lowest form I gained an immense advantage over the cleverer boys... I got into my bones the essential structure of the ordinary British sentence–which is a noble thing. Naturally I am biased in favor of boys learning English; I would make them all learn English: and then I would let the clever ones learn Latin as an honor, and Greek as a treat."
- karmakurtisaani 2y agoDuring my PhD I realized the longer you can extend it, the better (if you intend to stay in academia). If you do 6 years, you'll have the experience of someone who has already done one post doc, but you'll have easier time applying for grants since you're judged as a fresh PhD (possibly with a CV much better than the other applicants due to your extra time).
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- ykonstant 2y agoMy adviser insisted that I extended it as much as I could, but I didn't listen to him :(