3 ms·
Agreed about where the funds should go, and I'd also add that all intersections with cameras should have signs telling people of those cameras to get them to sl
by SkipperCat 2y ago
Agreed about where the funds should go, and I'd also add that all intersections with cameras should have signs telling people of those cameras to get them to slow down and stop running red lights. The goal of these cameras should be to reduce traffic infractions, not to profit from their proliferation.
- notJim 2y agoI initially agreed, but then I had the thought that this would lead to people just knowing which lights have camera and being extra careful around those, while freely running the lights elsewhere. Imagine if we had a problem where a bunch of people were burglarizing houses, so we decided to declare specific enforcement zones where the cops were really on top of preventing burglaries. Would people be less likely to burgle, or would they just do their burglaries elsewhere? Instead, town-wide, it should be made known with prominent signs that traffic enforcement is in use, and ideally the cameras should move around, so that people can't simply adjust their behavior to compensate. In other words, your idea, but put that sign on every intersection.
- LeafItAlone 2y ago> I initially agreed, but then I had the thought that this would lead to people just knowing which lights have camera and being extra careful around those, while freely running the lights elsewhere. That’s exactly what I’ve witnessed in places that have cameras, regardless of if there are signs.
- cafard 2y agoWhen I was in Charlotte, North Carolina, some years ago (20?) I saw signs at certain intersections announcing how many dollars had been collected from red-light cameras there.
- bromuro 2y ago> signs telling people of those cameras to get them to slow down and stop running This is why there’s a red light?