3 ms·
You seem to already know what an extradition treaty is, so why is this even a question?
by ranger_danger 2y ago
You seem to already know what an extradition treaty is, so why is this even a question?
- OutOfHere 2y agoWhat I'm saying is that there was no law of the US that was even violated within the jurisdiction of the US. This is different from incidents of hacking where US assets get attacked. As such, the I.P. charges seem entirely baseless to me. The extradition treaty applies only if a crime is actually committed in a jurisdiction where it is a crime. I do not see this here.
- saalweachter 2y agoCountries have treaties with each other to recognize and protect each other's copyrights.