3 ms·
For broader coverage/accuracy (minimization of misinformation), I think "religion" should be replaced with something like "the symbol representing the the metap
by mistermann 2y ago
For broader coverage/accuracy (minimization of misinformation), I think "religion" should be replaced with something like "the symbol representing the the metaphysical framework the individual subscribes to"....this way it also covers the science crowd as well.
For science I guess the symbol would just be "science"? Not sure what one would use for mystics.
Are there more than these three?
> Religion has filled the gap between that absolutely blissful state that one can achieve in his own nature, and one’s present level of instability.
Interestingly, this is a faith based belief: "X has Y" ("has" varies...."explains", "is caused by", "is the fault of", etc are some other variations) is reductive, and speculative. If it is presented as fact rather than opinion/belief, then it is belief without adequate supporting evidence, aka Faith. Or it could also be propaganda, misinformation, etc.
This is probably in violation of the dominant metaphysical framework of the era/region though, in which case how about we attach a "That's pedantic" or "Just joking!" label and call it even.
I'm actually a big Sadhguru fan, but he himself admits that he avoids reading too much so as to avoid contamination by ideological frameworks (like in this case, say...Set Theory, Semantics/Semiotics, Taoism, etc).
And presumably he is optimizing for personal peace and comfort. That is all well and good, but I personally have great concern for others suffering around the world, and brushing things under the carpet (to achieve solace, ironically) with Meme Magic like his is a big part of what causes those problems to persist across generations and centuries, even though it is (presumably) not necessary.
When COVID was on the scene, the well being of others was a big deal...but now that it's largely gone, we are back to "every man for himself", or "that's just the way it is". Disgraceful imho.
- 47282847 2y agoInteresting. Thanks for sharing your perspective. After reading Inner Engineering, I have a different understanding of the fundamental ideas Sadhguru has about responsibility. He comes from a place of ultimate and full responsibility of every single individual for everything that they do and don’t do to contribute to the wellbeing of all. Maybe you would enjoy the first few chapters where he develops this concept. Would be happy to hear what you think about it in context of those chapters!
- mistermann 2y agoDoes he get into the distinction between intent and accomplishment, or does he share science's approach to that: act as if there is no distinction? Sorry, I find it to be an interesting and important perspective.
- 47282847 2y agoIt’s been a while and I would like to scan the content of the book again before an attempt to answer that question. I have some idea but I would like to provide specific references. I am currently traveling and do not have access to my library so this will remain unanswered, at least from my end, for now. I see the point in your question!