3 ms·

Can I ask you a question, what do you think is better approach: 1) publish packages as wheels or 2) publish apps as docker images (or docker-compose files or he

by slt2021 2y ago

Can I ask you a question, what do you think is better approach: 1) publish packages as wheels or 2) publish apps as docker images (or docker-compose files or helm charts)? Why some People prefer 1 to 2? I think 2 is more “production friendly” and universal across other languages and stacks (same approach used for java js ruby etc)

lexicality 2y ago
How would you use the python `requests` library if it was packaged as a docker image?
- slt2021 2y ago
  I meant you package your whole app into container with all required libs, and dont publish your app as a package
rangerelf 2y ago
Vastly different use cases. Publish a module as a wheel if you want to be able to use pip to install it in your servers, or anywhere really. Once you've built out your virtual environment you can build your docker image and push it to a registry. Your helm chart should include references to docker images that are getting deployed to a kubernetes cluster, among other entities that need to be built out for your app to work. Those are all different layers of the deployment, independent of each other. If someone prefers 1 over 2 (or viceversa), they don't understand what they think they know.
- slt2021 2y ago
  By publishing module you refer to situation when a single module is reused across different applications? So if you dont have modules that used across apps, then you dont need to package and publish wheel? or if your modules are already vendored in your main application module (monorepo) then no need to package app as a wheel?
  - rangerelf 2y ago
    The wheel, kept on an Sudafed repository, will let you lock down your supply chain, plus no need to rebuild every time it gets used. I would build it once for whatever required architectures are needed, build wheels for them, amd use those for packaging up the final apps that need deploying (through docker, k8s, whatever).
eternityforest 2y ago
Wheels can be production friendly if you know that you're only ever going to care about one specific OS family, and your app is pure python+stuff available on PyPi. For internal use, where you can just pretend everything other than Debian based systems don't exist, it's ok, but I definitely see the value of docker, even though I like Snap a lot more. I'm surprised nobody has ever made a "distro" where all the packages had a thin python wrapper and installed from a private Pip repository, so you could package your whole app and all dependencies with it.

lexicality 2y ago

How would you use the python `requests` library if it was packaged as a docker image?

slt2021 2y ago
I meant you package your whole app into container with all required libs, and dont publish your app as a package

rangerelf 2y ago

Vastly different use cases. Publish a module as a wheel if you want to be able to use pip to install it in your servers, or anywhere really. Once you've built out your virtual environment you can build your docker image and push it to a registry. Your helm chart should include references to docker images that are getting deployed to a kubernetes cluster, among other entities that need to be built out for your app to work. Those are all different layers of the deployment, independent of each other. If someone prefers 1 over 2 (or viceversa), they don't understand what they think they know.

slt2021 2y ago
By publishing module you refer to situation when a single module is reused across different applications? So if you dont have modules that used across apps, then you dont need to package and publish wheel? or if your modules are already vendored in your main application module (monorepo) then no need to package app as a wheel?
- rangerelf 2y ago
  The wheel, kept on an Sudafed repository, will let you lock down your supply chain, plus no need to rebuild every time it gets used. I would build it once for whatever required architectures are needed, build wheels for them, amd use those for packaging up the final apps that need deploying (through docker, k8s, whatever).

eternityforest 2y ago

Wheels can be production friendly if you know that you're only ever going to care about one specific OS family, and your app is pure python+stuff available on PyPi. For internal use, where you can just pretend everything other than Debian based systems don't exist, it's ok, but I definitely see the value of docker, even though I like Snap a lot more. I'm surprised nobody has ever made a "distro" where all the packages had a thin python wrapper and installed from a private Pip repository, so you could package your whole app and all dependencies with it.