>It seems wrong that to sue someone for that in the first place, and then furthermore to win the case just seems wrong. That's a lot of 'seems' that ignores th

>It seems wrong that to sue someone for that in the first place, and then furthermore to win the case just seems wrong. That's a lot of 'seems' that ignores that last hundred years or so modern farming and the case law around seed patents that has existed since the 30s. > As children, before we're taught economics, we learn farmers plant seeds to grow corn to feed us. Suing the farmer for planting seeds hurts this very basic role we learned as kids. Generally anytime someone's argument is based around an appeal to emotions, you can be they aren't dealing with reality and logical thinking. Doubly so when you're talking about planting corn when discussing a case about canola.