> Technical reading is a skill. There's a large contingent who might not be conditioned to read more than a StackOverflow answer enough to copy&paste it. I'm no

> Technical reading is a skill. There's a large contingent who might not be conditioned to read more than a StackOverflow answer enough to copy&paste it. I'm not saying this to yell at the clouds... Oh, I definitely yell at the clouds about this. IMO, if you can't be bothered to read docs, don't take up other people's time with questions that could have been answered by yourself. > ...but because it seems to be true, and we'll have to confront it (but hopefully not via videos with 1% nutritional content). If by confront you mean "explain to people that they will have to put in the work," then yes, I agree. I'm very tired of people coming up with abstractions to paper over a lack of fundamental knowledge. Abstractions by themselves aren't a a bad thing, but they often leak, and you need to know what you're actually doing.