In this case they've clearly done the opposite. You seem to be arguing that the C-suite can do anything it wants to. As long as it does it in an official capac

In this case they've clearly done the opposite. You seem to be arguing that the C-suite can do anything it wants to. As long as it does it in an official capacity, it can cause whatever harm it wants. That seems like a very strange argument. Do you believe corporations and corporate officers have no moral obligation to act ethically? Because if so, I'm finding it hard to understand the difference between a corporation and a crime family.