3 ms·
Why, again, are the c suite being paid as much as they do if not to take on this risk?
by tossandthrow 2y ago
Why, again, are the c suite being paid as much as they do if not to take on this risk?
- roenxi 2y agoTo fullfill their role? Management and making decisions? Taking on personal risk has never been a part of the C suite beyond the tradition of giving them shares as part of their compensation. Shareholders use positive incentives, not negative ones. Because positive incentives generally lead to better results in this case.
- tossandthrow 2y agoSeems like the US has some really weird rules in this regard then. For the C-suite to take on personal risk is literally a part of the role where I live. the central business registry register those holding these roles for that exact reason.
- TheOtherHobbes 2y agoIn this case they've clearly done the opposite. You seem to be arguing that the C-suite can do anything it wants to. As long as it does it in an official capacity, it can cause whatever harm it wants. That seems like a very strange argument. Do you believe corporations and corporate officers have no moral obligation to act ethically? Because if so, I'm finding it hard to understand the difference between a corporation and a crime family.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- actionfromafar 2y agoWe need them energetic and vigorous! /s