3 ms·
> I still think it would be very anti-entrepreneurial culture to make company operators liable by default for everything their company does. Again, by missing
by rlpb 2y ago
> I still think it would be very anti-entrepreneurial culture to make company operators liable by default for everything their company does.
Again, by missing out the distinction in this sentence, you're using the implied (valid) case to limit civil liability to make it sound like the same should apply for criminal liability. You're failing to explain why arguments for this in the civil liability case should also apply in the criminal case.
- keiferski 2y agoBecause I think it would still result in a culture that is hostile to entrepreneurship not dissimilar to how bankruptcy is treated in other countries. And just to be clear here, I’m arguing against the idea that company operators should be by-default guilty if the company they operate commits a crime. Because that is what a lot of commenters here are arguing for. Not that they should be not be liable for crimes they personally, knowingly, commit.