>it’s hard to say what a 500-year storm even looks like. Not to worry, that was taken into account when they came up with the 500-year naming scheme. Sure it

>it’s hard to say what a 500-year storm even looks like. Not to worry, that was taken into account when they came up with the 500-year naming scheme. Sure it sounds like 500 consecutive years, but it's really a 1 in 500 chance of absolute devastation every year. How bad was the devastation? Approximately 5x as bad as the ones where it's only a 1 in 100 chance of striking every year, naturally.