I appreciate your view, and would not recommend these devices for qualifying or prescribing outcomes, however I have found at least one useful application: unde

I appreciate your view, and would not recommend these devices for qualifying or prescribing outcomes, however I have found at least one useful application: understanding why certain people have difficulty communicating with other certain people. Haven't you noticed there are plenty of instances even the most intelligent and experienced persons cannot communicate with each other? I find for instance that N/J's cannot communicate with S/P's in a more than superfluous way for instance (speaking the same language and everything.) x/J to N/x; or x/P to S/x are great. They "get" each other. The x/J to S/x just cannot. I correlate this as due to N/J using abstractions and S/P are pragmatists requiring concrete specificity. So a rough cut, sure, definitely "pseudo", however somehow practical as a guide explaining why some intelligent people do not pair well.