3 ms·
I still don't really understand. What is the conspiracy? Concretely, what is it that I believe is "going on," what is "actually" "going on", and how does the "
by doctorpangloss 2y ago
I still don't really understand.
What is the conspiracy? Concretely, what is it that I believe is "going on," what is "actually" "going on", and how does the "actually" "going on" part harm me or screw me... somehow?
- 1oooqooq 2y agoyou are on the detour thread about multicast. The original discussion was about NAT and how ISP will keep everyone needing NAT forever.
- doctorpangloss 2y agoBut NAT is needed because people use devices that were not designed to have a WAN interface. I was just interested in your POV, in good faith.