3 ms·
Second this. I'd much rather see more funding for a safer and secure browser than yet another browser that will have the same C and C++ memory corruption vulner
by rvz 2y ago
Second this. I'd much rather see more funding for a safer and secure browser than yet another browser that will have the same C and C++ memory corruption vulnerabilities again.
- _jackdk_ 2y agoThe FAQ at the bottom of https://ladybird.org/ https://ladybird.org/ has this easily-overlooked section: > However, now that Ladybird has forked and become its own independent project, all constraints previously imposed by SerenityOS are no longer in effect. We are actively evaluating a number of alternatives and will be adding a mature successor language to the project in the near future. This process is already quite far along, and prototypes exist in multiple languages. So it looks like there's a plan to refactor away from C++ as it spreads its wings. I'm in favour of people funding any browser engine with a realistic shot at viability.