> The article mentions the model doesn't work well on things that it has not seen in its training data, which makes the whole argument of AGI spontaneously appe

> The article mentions the model doesn't work well on things that it has not seen in its training data, which makes the whole argument of AGI spontaneously appearing given more data a bit unrealistic. It seems like we're talking about two different things. If you understand what ChatGPT is, and what it can and can't do, then there's no problem. It's a useful tool. If you think ChatGPT is AGI or it's going to replace actual programmers soon, then there's a problem. To me, it sounds like the issue is mostly unrealistic expectations.