4 ms·

The author expands and addresses each within the article. What marks of a strawman do you see within the author’s description?

• ruszki 2y ago
  > It’s a strawman, because it’s so simplified that they lost all meaning. In other words: nobody ever thought these. Thoughts are way more complex. Also writing more sentences without any substance is not expanding. Edit: to expand a little bit. Nobody thinks that time runs out. They think that time runs out about X in the context of Y. Even when people use the absolutist version there is always a context. Author transformed these to the usual religious absolutism nonsense with no good reason, except of course that absolutists statements are easier to attack, hence the strawman.