I have something like Betteridge's law about anything implying "fact checking" in its title. What about The Insider's "investigative report" (https://archive.i

I have something like Betteridge's law about anything implying "fact checking" in its title. What about The Insider's "investigative report" (https://archive.is/KbT6t https://archive.is/KbT6t) or stuff like project PANDORA? I mean, it's not like the other side of the question is massively more trustworthy, but it's not just tabloid conjectures either... In the end, like for 99% of all past and present events, the only sensible position is "I don't know".