> so I would disagree that both can "easily" do harm Easily enough but you're 100% correct that there's a fairly huge difference between the two extremes in ho

> so I would disagree that both can "easily" do harm Easily enough but you're 100% correct that there's a fairly huge difference between the two extremes in how easy (or hard) they are to reach. Dehydrated to a dangerous point is most assuredly typically easier to achieve. Certainly easier by far to die from, too, as evidenced by how often the one happens compared to the other.