3 ms·
Those numbers include contributions to PACs, which was the point. It was also my point that it isn’t obvious how to limit donations to groups publishing inform
by creato 2y ago
Those numbers include contributions to PACs, which was the point.
It was also my point that it isn’t obvious how to limit donations to groups publishing information, such as Wikipedia. Today, PACs have a carveout that distinguishes them from organizations like Wikipedia or propublica, but not in a way that limits contributions. Those organizations would be the subject of lawsuits and scrutiny that would be hard to codify in a reasonable way if that were not the case.
- WillAdams 2y agoIt's my point too --- we need some law which will pass muster and rate limit such contributions.