3 ms·
> Bug fixes work a lot like efficiency improvements, the main difference being that competent management makes things much worse. You can’t make fixing bugs int
by matrix87 2y ago
> Bug fixes work a lot like efficiency improvements, the main difference being that competent management makes things much worse. You can’t make fixing bugs into a “goal,” same as you can’t make optimization into a goal, because people will just add more bugs up front and then fix some of them.
If competent management makes things worse, then it isn't really competent management. I'm not sure why introducing additional process is considered a sign of competence
Instead of setting arbitrary goals, couldn't they just pay attention to the things that people are actually working on and give out rewards/punishments based off of their own judgement? If you need to create some elaborate resource quota CI/CD system because you can't trust employees to do things decently, then it's a people problem
- IsopropylMalbec 2y agoThe post is saying that it is a people problem. The gist is that efficient or beautiful architecture does not mirror efficient or beautiful management.
- matrix87 2y ago> But if there’s a reliable & scalable way for vigorous, systematic management to reward the spontaneous human drive towards efficiency instead of punishing it, I am yet to see it. This is the gist of the article, it has nothing to do with software architecture