3 ms·
One word: bollocks. It'll get overruled by a judge the moment they are taken to court.
by gouranga 14y ago
One word: bollocks.
It'll get overruled by a judge the moment they are taken to court.
- Caerus 14y agoUnfortunately no. The Supreme Court has already ruled that this is legal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T_Mobility_v._Concepcion http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T_Mobility_v._Concepcion
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- DannyBee 14y agoThis had nothing to do with the Supreme Court being corporatist. The problem here is simple: Congress passed a law making mandatory individual arbitration clauses/etc clauses in contracts legal. The supreme court simply said "yeah, they can do that". Your real problem here is with Congress passing dumb laws, not a "corporatist" Supreme Court. I'll also point out that the Supreme Court were the ones who created/imported representative litigation into the US in the first place, and the ones who started to interpret the federal rules of civil procedure in a manner that allowed representative litigation like class actions.