4 ms·
This is an issue in many cities in the US as well, where owners of view properties are suspected or found to have killed a tree to improve their use of the land
by blackeyeblitzar 2y ago
This is an issue in many cities in the US as well, where owners of view properties are suspected or found to have killed a tree to improve their use of the land. Sometimes it’s on their own property but sometimes it’s on adjacent public property. And sometimes it’s using a chainsaw and sometimes poison.
In Seattle, a city with lots of trees, the big problem today is sanctioned tree killing. The current over-focus on building housing and increasing density has meant revised tree codes that are friendly to builders and reduced enforcement that ignores the obvious destruction of the city’s tree cover.
As an example: a friend living next to a new development saw the builders come cut down several large old trees in the evening on a weekend (probably to avoid attention), and immediately feed them into a large wood chipper towed on site. They were alerted to it by the sound of big trees crashing to the ground. It all happened very quickly. The city was involved due to complaints from multiple neighbors but they decided there was no evidence the trees were protected (due to size), which of course was by design since the evidence was immediately shredded and no one was quick enough to get a photo of the crime. In the end the city did find there was illegal clearing of many trees without appropriate permits (from old survey maps of the lot), but chose not to apply the code and fines (which can be big for large trees) and let the developer plant a small number of saplings in some other site (outside of the city) as if that were equivalent. What was especially concerning was the city told complaining neighbors that they were choosing to not enforce the law because it is a property developer and not a private homeowner.
In my experience, this type of unofficially permitted tree killing by builders is much more common and a far bigger problem than the rare issue of a private homeowner taking down a tree or two. Apart from the attitude towards new development, it is also an issue of corruption since the organizations representing builders are very involved (financially and otherwise) in local politics.
- jackyinger 2y agoSeattle does have a concept of “exceptional trees” (a big old tree worth saving) which are protected by law. But it requires involving the city for them to be recognized and documented. A friend quashed a developers’ plans in West Seattle by getting ahold of the city to come out and look at what he thought was likely an exceptional tree. The city arborist confirmed that it was and noted that several more were as well. YMMV, but definitely advocate and engage the city ASAP if there’s any sign of development around big trees.
- blackeyeblitzar 2y agoMy friend says the trees in that situation were definitely exceptional but that the survey maps don’t track tree size or age, just locations and types. So the neighbors had no evidence of the trees being exceptional, except their testimony. The city basically chose not to investigate the practice of cutting trees at an odd hour or the immediately shredding of the trees to destroy the evidence. The issue the neighbors wanted enforced was that it was an environmentally protected area due to the property being on a slope and with a stream next to the slope. That’s what the city had the complete ability to give the builders big fines for, but they chose not to.
- klyrs 2y agoWhat I don't understand about this story is that it takes a ton of work to uproot a tree, and if you don't do that, there would be evidence of exceptional trees in the form of their stumps. Makes me wonder who the builders know.
- workingdog 2y agoI love trees. I plant a lot of them. I noticed one friendly neighbor remark that one of our oldest cedars was a fine specimen and that he wanted to register it. It got girdled, and I cut it down as soon as possible. I planted three trees.
- m463 2y agoI don't understand, did you girdle the tree?
- workingdog 2y agoYou may think that, but I couldn't possibly comment. I was trying to convey that laws should be carefully written, not to motivate people to do things that keep them inside the law yet are still damaging.