6 ms·
It doesn't seem to be their database, and "download the dataset and do this locally" doesn't make sense to me in terms of building what they wanted.
by IanCal 2y ago
It doesn't seem to be their database, and "download the dataset and do this locally" doesn't make sense to me in terms of building what they wanted.
- romwell 2y ago>doesn't make sense to me in terms of building what they wanted What is it that you think they wanted, and why doesn't keeping the data locally make sense? If what they wanted is learning a graph DB API, then sure. Otherwise, please elaborate. To me, this looks like a perfect fit for a SQLite database (see my other comment). Their entire dataset has a smaller size than the HTML page you're reading right now. If they wanted cloud sync, they could simply send the entire thing over the wire. Or, you know, use SQL. Though unless they're running a custom-order ceramics factory, that'd be an overkill. But hey, they'd learn why SQL is useful from that.
- ajkjk 2y agooh, I misread > I also happen to know the founders of Instant, which bills itself as a graph-based Firebase as "to be one of the founders" Regardless.