> celebrating proprietary, vendor-specific-extensions in our open source tools It's not proprietary nor vendor specific. I'm not sure what makes cURL "our" to

> celebrating proprietary, vendor-specific-extensions in our open source tools It's not proprietary nor vendor specific. I'm not sure what makes cURL "our" tool? > by nature, supposed to operate in a vendor-agnostic manner? Does the inclusion of this feature mean a different feature cannot coexist with it? Was it so absurdly complicated to develop that it took time away from other integrations? > This flag makes zero sense for anyone who isn't an AWS customer. Do you also dislike QUIC or RTMP? How about NTLM? > that "being an AWS customer" is not free Yea but "using AWS protocols outside of AWS" _is_ free. > It really surprises me that this made it into curl. They should turn down useful but impure contributions? The lead developer of cURL still has a day job.