4 ms·
Time to push for muon-catalyzed fusion: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion There is one c
by jhallenworld 2y ago
Time to push for muon-catalyzed fusion:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon-catalyzed_fusion
There is one company trying it:
https://www.acceleron.energy/ https://www.acceleron.energy/
Muon production efficiency optimization is a worthwhile engineering problem. The accelerator needed to make the muons can already be made more efficient than assumed in the classic papers.
Muon-catalyzed fusion does not require the unlikely combination of 100M degree plasma generating huge power right next to cryogenic superconducting magnets.
Muon-catalyzed fusion can already run continuously, unlike plasma fusion. There is none of this "it can run for x seconds" nonsense.
The efficiency needs to be greater than 1, but all parts of the power plant are included in this calculation. So, for example, making a more efficient steam turbine helps. So consider..
A tritium breeding blanket is needed for all kinds of D-T fusion including plasma to locally make the tritium fuel from the fusion neutrons. If you include U-238 in it, you double the power output thanks to all of the resulting fissions.. just as in an H-bomb. This could push the plant efficiency above 1..
- sirwhinesalot 2y agoOf all the fusion approaches muon-catalyzed has always seemed to be the most promising one for me, mostly because needed improvements are so clear: make muons cheaper to produce and/or make them catalyze more fusions. All the other ones seem much harder to achieve. Well, maybe that weird approach Helion is trying will pay off, who knows.