3 ms·
> The cooling would only be temporary anyway. And, increase CO2, increasing warming, in the long term. I would also naively assume that the reduced light would
by nomel 2y ago
> The cooling would only be temporary anyway.
And, increase CO2, increasing warming, in the long term. I would also naively assume that the reduced light would somewhat pause natural sequestration, from plants, for the duration of the cooling.
- DaoVeles 2y agoI had not thought about that. That is a reasonable collusion about a non intuitive feedback loop.
- seadan83 2y agoThe article noted the CO2 released matches what humans do in 2.5 hours. Yet, some eruptions have lowered temps globally for months/years. The long term effect from the CO2 is real, but also a tiny drop in the bucket compared to humans