4 ms·
I thought this article was railing against the lumping together of entire spans of hundreds of years as being alike (ie, we lump together 1901 and 1999 under th
by wryoak 2y ago
I thought this article was railing against the lumping together of entire spans of hundreds of years as being alike (ie, we lump together 1901 and 1999 under the name ”the 1900s” despite their sharing only numerical similarity), and was interested until I learned the author’s real, much less interesting intention
- endofreach 2y agoMany people find their own thoughts more interesting than the ones of others. Some write. Many don't.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- layer8 2y ago[flagged]
- psychoslave 2y agoI found your sarcasm very enjoyable and ended up disappointed I couldn't come with the next meta-sarcasm. How dare you?!