3 ms·

I admit I hadn't set up 1.0.0.1 but the secondary IPv6 one as backup. Neither worked. I run Pi-hole, haven't noticed any significant difference in speed. But g

• magicalhippo 2y ago
  Just as a follow-up, using this[1] tool it seems that from my location Quad9 is about as fast as Cloudflare. Both faster than Google. Now, I'm in Norway and Quad9 is in Switzerland, so that might be related. 1. 1. 1. 1 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%| ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ - Cached Name | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.014 | 0.001 | 100.0 | - Uncached Name | 0.010 | 0.046 | 0.249 | 0.056 | 100.0 | - DotCom Lookup | 0.009 | 0.014 | 0.021 | 0.002 | 100.0 | ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ one.one.one.one CLOUDFLARENET, US 9. 9. 9. 9 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%| ----------------+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ - Cached Name | 0.009 | 0.012 | 0.015 | 0.001 | 100.0 | - Uncached Name | 0.013 | 0.066 | 0.286 | 0.074 | 100.0 | - DotCom Lookup | 0.029 | 0.042 | 0.060 | 0.012 | 100.0 | ---<-------->---+-------+-------+-------+-------+-------+ dns9.quad9.net QUAD9-AS-1, CH [1]: https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm https://www.grc.com/dns/benchmark.htm