3 ms·
I agree - once you've settled your math on consciousness, you can go back and modify the priors based on new evidence. One of the crazier suppositions that actu
by observationist 2y ago
I agree - once you've settled your math on consciousness, you can go back and modify the priors based on new evidence. One of the crazier suppositions that actually makes a dent in the posterior probability is the simulation hypothesis.
If all civilizations that develop computation and simulation capabilities converge to the development of high fidelity simulations, then it's highly likely that they would create simulations of interesting periods of history, such as the period of time when computers, the internet, AI, and other technologies were developed. We just so happen to be living through that - I still put my odds of living in base reality somewhere above 98%, but there is a distinct possibility that we're all being simulated so that this period of history can be iterated and perturbed and studied, or some such scenario.
Maybe someone ought to start studying the science of universal adversarial simulation attacks, to elicit some glitches in the matrix. That'd be one hell of a paper.
- pixl97 2y ago>That'd be one hell of a paper Until 'they' restore the checkpoint and arrange your teams plane to fall out of the sky.
- ninjanomnom 2y agoTaking this as true, wouldn't that mean that a lack of published papers on this topic is light evidence of being in a simulation? Also that it would be fairly dangerous to bring the subject to the public's attention.