3 ms·
BLS itself tracks indicators down to far smaller granularity than "the entire labor force." Here are all monthly releases for employment: https://www.bls.gov/ne
by nonameiguess 2y ago
BLS itself tracks indicators down to far smaller granularity than "the entire labor force." Here are all monthly releases for employment: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.toc.htm https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.toc.htm
There isn't anything that drills down to sector-level, but the employment situation by occupation is probably the closest: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t13.htm https://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.t13.htm
It doesn't get as far down as software or computing-related occupations, but these would fall under the broader "professional and related occupations." This seemingly encompasses most white collar work and it has the third-lowest unemployment rate, behind only maintenance and repair operations and management and finance.
Obviously, a lot of what you feel is happening will be colored by the particular people you know. It's probably wrong to even think of that as "tech employment." My wife and I both work for software companies. I don't personally know anyone who has been laid off in the past year. But I live in Texas and we both work in defense software. San Francisco adjacent web tech is not the entirety of "tech."
- AlotOfReading 2y agoYou're pretty lucky to be unaffected. I'm not in defense, but just off the top of my head Lockheed is doing layoffs in CT due to the loss of FARA. Raytheon is continuing their layoff death spiral and shutting down some stuff in Texas. Boeing is hemorrhaging people and money for obvious reasons. That's just the three largest contractors.