2 ms·
I don't get your reasoning. Not lying about Iraq would have been considered a 'lie'. Those in power decides what is considered a lie or not.
by rightbyte 2y ago
I don't get your reasoning.
Not lying about Iraq would have been considered a 'lie'.
Those in power decides what is considered a lie or not.
- mandmandam 2y ago> Not lying about Iraq would have been considered a 'lie'. ... What? > Those in power decides what is considered a lie or not. Not necessarily. There are in fact ways to give that power to independent groups, and to protect them from capture. Diversified funding, transparent auditing and finances, whistleblower protections, short tenures, etc etc. Saying that it's just impossible is, again, awfully defeatist - and we can't afford not to try.