4 ms·
It's not an EU requirement (at the moment, at least). Interoperability is required, and MLS is an IETF standard (RFC 9420) to accomplish secure cross service me
by jeroenhd 2y ago
It's not an EU requirement (at the moment, at least). Interoperability is required, and MLS is an IETF standard (RFC 9420) to accomplish secure cross service messaging.
Several Facebook people (@fb.com) were taking part in protocol design, so I wouldn't say they'll never adopt it. It all depends on how much shit the EU is willing to take when it comes to interoperability.
MLS without MIMI isn't going to change much, though, and MIMI is still a work in progress.
- bertman 2y agoMIMI: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mimi/about/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mimi/about/ (More Instant Messaging Interoperability)
- jauntywundrkind 2y ago> MLS is agnostic to the identity system used within any given messaging service; it provides confidentiality of sessions once the participants in a conversation have been identified. To achieve interoperable messaging, the MIMI working group will specify how one or more identity building block technologies (for example, X.509 certificates or Verifiable Credentials) can be used to establish end-to-end cryptographic identity across messaging services, assuming the use of MLS for key establishment. Indeed MLS alone is nowhere near good enough to make systems interoperate. Here's to hoping MIMI takes significantly less of a fraction of a decade to get built that MLS took (5 years since chartered, 3 years after initial due dates).