In my opinion its likely not naivety at all but a campaign following standard socialist ploys in subversion (cultural contagion). They hit most of the common r

In my opinion its likely not naivety at all but a campaign following standard socialist ploys in subversion (cultural contagion). They hit most of the common rhetoric talking points, and its common knowledge in some circles that these types promote narratives that attempt or build support for various stages of divide and conquer under communism. Be it, demoralization, destabilization, crisis, or re-normalization (genocide). The article promotes cancel culture, which is just another derivation of marxism. Reads like some of the more skilled propaganda pieces I've seen. Knowing this, I wouldn't trust the author for anything that requires credibility.