3 ms·
What kind of articles are you reading where this is useful? I either read articles that are 1) fun to read and silly, or 2) fun to read and informative. If the
by lionkor 2y ago
What kind of articles are you reading where this is useful?
I either read articles that are 1) fun to read and silly, or 2) fun to read and informative. If they're not fun to read, it's unlikely that the content is any good. Good educators often know how to write in an engaging way. If the content is difficult to read, or super lengthy, it's probably shit content.
How do you judge quality of the information you're given when you have it summarized? How do you make sure the LLM didn't misunderstand something, like sarcasm, or a quote, etc.?
- cglong 2y agoHere's the most recent article I summarized: https://daringfireball.net/2024/06/wwdc24_apple_intelligence https://daringfireball.net/2024/06/wwdc24_apple_intelligence Gruber has always been loquacious, but this one seemed excessive to me. Still, I was curious for his overall impressions on Apple Intelligence. The summary sounded interesting to me, so I then dedicated time to read the source. To your credit, ChatGPT's summary was much more critical than the actual article.
- lionkor 2y agofair, thank you!