statistically more likely to find it misused does not seem to match up with almost everyone misuses, although I guess you could argue there was some sort of law

statistically more likely to find it misused does not seem to match up with almost everyone misuses, although I guess you could argue there was some sort of law that once a tool moves beyond only expert usage to ubiquitous usage all non expert users added in ubiquitous phase will misuse tool therefore making it seem that it is the tool's fault. I would argue however this is not the case for well-designed tools, and then people who are not experts can become experts with such and not misuse, keeping the percentage of misuse of a well-designed tool at an even level as usage increase. The percentage of misuse rising at a rate nearly equal to its usage rate indicates a poorly designed tool / that something is lacking.