4 ms·
which would be precisely the idea. I think you may be struggling with the word "works". and "exampled". and perhaps even "trained" vague image + entire corpus
by permo-w 2y ago
which would be precisely the idea.
I think you may be struggling with the word "works". and "exampled". and perhaps even "trained"
vague image + entire corpus of human imagery = ?
- furyofantares 2y agoOr perhaps they are not struggling with the word "reconstruct"
- permo-w 2y agoit sounds to me like people don't like/are sceptical about generative AI, not that they're so expert in the area that they can give a valid opinion on whether this is possible or useful. part of the technique that diffusion models use is literally to take a vague image of something and then use training data to build it into something more clear. this whole comment chain is so confidently wrong it's unbelievable
- furyofantares 2y agoSomething more clear is totally different than reconstructing. If an artists rendition of what it might have looked like would be useful, then genAI may be cheaper for that task. But we wouldn't call an artist's rendition of what it might have looked like "reconstructing". And you couldn't be much more wrong about how much I like and use generative AI.