4 ms·
I am not sure what your comment means. We are almost 5 years past Oct 2019, are we not? If that’s what you intended to point out, I am sorry.
by mlyle 2y ago
I am not sure what your comment means. We are almost 5 years past Oct 2019, are we not?
If that’s what you intended to point out, I am sorry.
- pjmlp 2y agoFrom 2022, https://msrc.microsoft.com/blog/2022/09/whats-the-smallest-variety-of-cheri/ https://msrc.microsoft.com/blog/2022/09/whats-the-smallest-v... From 2023, https://msrc.microsoft.com/blog/2023/02/first-steps-in-cheriot-security-research/ https://msrc.microsoft.com/blog/2023/02/first-steps-in-cheri... From 2024 https://lowrisc.org/news/lowrisc-and-microsoft-collaborate-to-help-bring-the-revolutionary-cheriot-ibex-core-to-production-grade/ https://lowrisc.org/news/lowrisc-and-microsoft-collaborate-t...
- mlyle 2y agoAgain, it's just better if you say what you're trying to say, instead of posting a bunch of links and let us figure it out. I don't know how any of your links really let us weigh ARM's commitment to CHERI going forward, which is the point of discussion. Indeed, none of those 3 links has anything to do with ARM at all, other than the first mentioning Morello. The comment you responded to is this: > It's not clear to me if ARM (the company) is actually interested in pursuing Cheri
- pjmlp 2y agoIt is the commitment of Microsoft Research dollars.
- mlyle 2y agoWe're discussing whether this is a likely future direction for ARM, and whether ARM will continue to invest in this or push this as a key future direction. That is what you replied to. You've shown nothing other than ARM was interested in taking some research money in the past. And, frankly, you've wasted my time with links trying to figure out what you were saying (which turned out to be irrelevant). Sigh.