3 ms·
There's a number of DNS-like protocols on blockchain, e.g. ENS (Ethereum Name System - https://ens.domains/ https://ens.domains/), Handshake (https://handshake.
by killerstorm 2y ago
There's a number of DNS-like protocols on blockchain, e.g. ENS (Ethereum Name System - https://ens.domains/ https://ens.domains/), Handshake (https://handshake.org/ https://handshake.org/).
They provide same functionality as DNS[sec]. You are not at whim of a corpo, nobody can suspend you, corrupting or hijacking records is pretty much impossible...
- warkdarrior 2y agoThat sounds like an excellent feature. Especially for phishing and other scammers who need bulletproof hosting.
- killerstorm 2y agoPhishing should be handled on a separate level. There are already many anti-phishing solutions: Chrome has a built-in phishing database, it shows a warning in place of a phish web site. Many VPN and anti-virus software packages come with bad site blockers, it can be done on DNS resolver level, etc. This is a free market solution: different vendors can compete in phish detection, and users can choose one which works the best. There's really no need for TLD provider to do this. And we see why it's a bad idea: a mistake can lead to thousands of legitimate sites being kicked off. Why are you advocating a solution which is clearly inferior?