4 ms·
I agree Dawkins shouldn't be talking about theology in general as he obviously hasn't studied it. He is fine to great in explaining the evolutionary evidence wh
by tasty_freeze 2y ago
I agree Dawkins shouldn't be talking about theology in general as he obviously hasn't studied it. He is fine to great in explaining the evolutionary evidence why young earth creationism is wrong, but is out of his depth when discussing the bigger picture. That doesn't make him an idiot.
- mistermann 2y agoOk, what term do you believe should be applied to someone who professionally mocks people's intellectual shortcomings (real or imagined...this gets into another variation of the phenomenon), and in so doing demonstrates that he too suffers from the very same abstract problem, to the cheers of audiences who also suffer from the same problem (many of whom will then recommend his work, spreading this mind virus (both data & methodology) ever further)? Is the irony of this circle jerk of delusion not a bit thick?